GCCs are moving from cost to capability
Cost and efficiency are essential areas of focus for GCCs, but they are no longer strategic differentiators. Organizations expect GCCs to contribute to the business through higher-value roles in digital transformation and innovation. This transition reflects a broader evolution in the role of GCCs, from cost centers to enterprise capability hubs that shape business outcomes.
Not all GCCs are evolving at the same pace. Some are further along the maturity curve while others are still focused on more traditional cost-focused activities. But the trajectory for GCCs is clear. When asked about the role GCCs will play over the next five years, survey respondents identified digital transformation as the most vital, followed by innovation and R&D (Figure 1). Cost optimization, while still important, was among the least distinctive future roles.
Figure 1: Digital Transformation and Innovation Emerge as the top expected roles for GCCs
Note: These numbers are weighted averages.
Similarly, when asked which capabilities will drive GCC expansion, respondents prioritized advanced technology and analytics and horizontal centers of excellence ahead of tech support and operations and business process management (Figure 2). These findings suggest that GCC growth is oriented more around the depth of specialized capabilities and their contribution to enterprise value rather than functional breadth and execution.
Figure 2: Capability Depth Will Drive GCC Expansion
Note: These numbers are weighted averages.
Strategic importance has outpaced organizational integration
As GCCs transition from delivery centers to enterprise capability hubs, their strategic importance continues to rise. Nearly 60% of survey respondents described their GCC as critical to their organization’s global strategy. Workforce representation within GCCs is also expected to increase: 83% of leaders surveyed anticipate GCCs to house 10% to 40% of their organization’s global workforce, while 17% of leaders expect them to house more than 40%.
Nearly 60% of survey respondents described their GCC as critical to their organization’s global strategy.
However, enterprise integration has not kept pace with strategic importance. Even though GCCs increasingly shape enterprise strategy, they face several obstacles, most notably, limited executive sponsorship and a tone from the top that reinforces underrepresentation in global leadership and low access to enterprise decision-making forums (Figure 3). Indeed, most leadership roles remain concentrated outside GCCs. Approximately 70% of GCC leaders expect their centers to house 10% or fewer of their organization’s CEO-1 and CEO-2 roles.
Figure 3: Obstacles to GCC evolution
Note: Reflects weighted averages for survey rankings; emphasis in the article reflects themes that emerged most strongly in executive interviews, including "tone from the top.
This disconnect is also reflected in executive engagement: 41% of GCC leaders reported engaging with boards or executive sponsors quarterly, while only 24% reported doing so monthly and 35% interacted annually/biannually or rarely/never (Figure 4). This lack of engagement has broader consequences: innovation is constrained by strategic ambiguity, defined as unclear enterprise priorities, fragmented operating models and limited leadership alignment. As one senior GCC executive acutely observed, "The strategic importance of a GCC is determined less by its size and more by the strength of its executive sponsorship."
Figure 4: Engagement frequency with boards/sponsors varies
Collectively, these findings affirm that the biggest barriers to GCC integration are organizational, rather than technical. GCCs have already demonstrated they can deliver enterprise-level capabilities — the next step is enterprise integration.
GCCs of the future require integrated enterprise leaders
If organizational barriers are the obstacles to deeper integration, then the solution is a renewed leadership model that enables GCCs to operate as enterprise leaders. Based on our research, four organizational shifts can reshape the existing leadership model and accelerate enterprise integration:
- Provide greater visibility into enterprise strategy
-
Develop stronger executive sponsorship
- Enable GCC participation in enterprise decision-making
- Increase GCC ownership of global roles and business outcomes
Survey respondents identified four capabilities that will be most critical for successful future leaders: a global mindset, strategic vision, stakeholder influence and a deep understanding of the business.
At the same time, GCC leaders must ensure they have the requisite capabilities to operate at the enterprise level — transitioning away from operational excellence and toward global influence and strategic alignment. Survey respondents identified four capabilities that will be most critical for successful future leaders: a global mindset, strategic vision, stakeholder influence and a deep understanding of the business.
Integration, however, is a collaborative effort. Therefore, GCCs and HQs can pursue several actions that enable both enterprise integration and the development of critical enterprise leadership capabilities.
Recommendations for HQ
-
Create enterprise leadership opportunities irrespective of geography: HQs should roll out leadership development programs and project rotations across every office, regardless of location. This method casts a wider net for potential promising leaders to transition to GCCs and fill a global role. It also gives aspiring leaders a greater understanding of how the business operates.
-
Build sustained executive sponsorship beyond a single champion: Relying on one executive sponsor creates risk because if they leave the company or transition into a different role, that support system is gone. By broadening sponsorship beyond a single executive, GCCs remain engaged and integrated even amid leadership changes.
-
Embed GCC leaders into enterprise governance and decision-making: HQ should involve GCC leaders in a range of forums, including annual strategy discussions, operating reviews, succession planning and transformation initiatives. This exposure gives them the opportunity to participate in enterprise decision-making and better understand the global business strategy.
Recommendations for leadership
-
Assess for enterprise capabilities, not only operational expertise. As previously mentioned, enterprise capabilities such as stakeholder influence and a global mindset are critical to successful GCC leaders. These skills enable them to exercise strong business judgment and acumen, lead even in fluid and complex environments and navigate a matrix structure while driving results. Leadership teams assess potential leaders against these criteria.
-
Build enterprise exposure through sponsorship, mobility and executive coaching. A direct reporting line to the CEO or CXO gives GCC leaders vital exposure to executive leadership and can establish informative sponsor relationships. Executive coaching also enables leadership development and maturity through focused feedback and a clear development pathway to improve leadership capabilities. As one GCC leader we spoke with emphasized, enterprise influence comes from spending time with customers, frontline operations and business leaders, shaping a deep understanding of how the organization creates value before attempting to transform it.
-
Develop leaders who can influence across global matrix organizations. The most effective GCC leaders can influence senior and C-suite stakeholders across functions such as business, operations and technology. Skills in cross-functional collaboration, talent development and employee engagement help drive enterprise-wide impact across complex environments.
Conclusion
Future GCC success depends less on building new capabilities and more on integrating existing capabilities and leadership into the enterprise. Organizations that elevate GCC leaders to the level of business partners — with authority, visibility and accountability — will be best positioned to unlock the full value of their global talent and expertise and achieve a competitive advantage.
The authors wish to thank Archisha Sharma for her contributions to this article.